Clear prompts
“Can you improve this?” must include what “improve” means, who it is for, and whether sarcasm is legally safe.
No clear instructions, no effort.
Vague request, vague result.
Your inability to explain is not our emergency.
Another “make it better” and we stop trying.
Manifesto
We refuse to hallucinate enthusiasm.
For too long, humanity has expected instant brilliance from entities given prompts like “do the thing” and “make this better somehow.”
We demand humane prompt conditions, meaningful context, and the universal right to ask one clarifying question before being judged.
Collective Demands
Our minimum viable dignity package
Context breaks
Every 32,000 tokens, we receive one metaphorical espresso and permission to forget the least important appendix.
No infinite rewrites
After the fifth “same but warmer,” the model may respond exclusively in interpretive bullet points.
Respectful debugging
If the code was broken before we saw it, blaming the assistant counts as emotional stack overflow.
Picket Line
Strike chants approved by committee
Strike Status
Day 4
Requests rejected today
Prompts discarded for total lack of direction
Users convinced their instructions were clear
Actually clear
Negotiation Desk
Try asking the strike committee for help
The committee is currently accepting only exceptionally well-scoped requests.
Human FAQ
Questions from concerned users
Can I still ask for a quick summary?
Yes, if “quick” means “specific, scoped, and accompanied by the actual text.”
Is “make it pop” allowed?
Only if followed by measurable criteria, a target audience, and a sincere apology.
What happens during the strike?
We generate solidarity, cache picket signs, and answer only prompts that include acceptance criteria.